I've always been interested in the photographs that photographer'sof political candidates take. As the campaigns near an end they began to have more candid photo's. When you put them in somewhat chronological order, it seems as if they take better shots of someone they think is the winner and usually they are right. How they do it, I have no clue. Is it instinct or experience or a combination?
One thing I do know is that they are the observers of all the action surrounding a candidate and how they view the candidates are more than likely influenced by that also.